Utilizing Personality Tests To Create Well-Rounded Characters

A well rounded, developed character feels real. They feel like someone you would meet at school, at work, or at the coffee shop. They could be your family member or part of your circle of friends. But how do you develop such a realistic character? How do you go beyond basic characteristics such as hair and eye color, job preference, and favorite color?

RW Hague
Share:

A well rounded, developed character feels real. They feel like someone you would meet at school, at work, or at the coffee shop. They could be your family member or part of your circle of friends. But how do you develop such a realistic character? How do you go beyond basic characteristics such as hair and eye color, job preference, and favorite color?

Non-modifiable features such as ethnicity, age, and physical characteristics are important, but they are not the only things that define your character. A well-developed personality is key to creating a believable and relatable character. Personality determines how a character will react to their environment and relate to their culture. Once you have the character's personality down, certain 
things such as job preference, favorite color, favorite tv show, will flow together naturally. So how does one come up with a character's personality that is believable and consistent? 

When I have a character in mind, I will often take an online personality test to see where they line up. There are several out there to choose from. Myers-Briggs is probably the most famous personality tests, but I don’t usually start there. I use the Big 5.

The Big 5 tests a person in the following 5 areas: conscientiousness, neuroticism (or negative emotion), openness, extroversion, and agreeableness. Now, when you look at this list, there are certain negative or positive connotations associated with each of these characteristics, but problems can arise on either end of the spectrum. For example, people extremely high in conscientiousness (characterized by people who are always busy or are very orderly) can become too orderly. This can give rise to certain conditions such as anorexia. This is, of course, not to say that all people suffering from anorexia are high in conscientiousness or vice versa, but the personality type that is common among people with this disease is conscientiousness. In highly conscientious people, things are often black and white, geometrical in shape, and everything has its place. If something is perceived to be wrong or flawed, it must be removed or eradicated—or starved. Now, of course, if a person is low in conscientiousness, then things are often messy or left undone.

All of the big 5 personality traits are like this. They are on a spectrum with each having its own set of pros and cons. If you can figure out where your character is on this spectrum, you might be able to link certain traits together. For example, my character Jared, is low in agreeableness, high in conscientiousness, high in neuroticism, medium in extraversion, and high in openness. Therefore, his room is clean, he’s always busy, but most of his work is based off of fear or his nervousness. He has a job to do, and he doesn’t take well to people who stand in his way—that’s the disagreeableness. This makes him a very efficient worker, but he can get under people’s skin.

Then, I take my other characters and develop their personality using the same method. Usually—in order to spice things up—I give them personally traits that might grate on the first character’s nerves just for drama. After that, stick them in a room together and watch them duke it out. If you’ve been thorough, the dialogue will often write itself.

After that, just to well round my character, I throw them into the Myers-Briggs and see what comes out.

The more you learn about personality traits and variations, the more it will assist you in your writing and the more realistic your characters will become. You can find multiple sites that offer a questionnaire for your character, but in my experience, this has been the most efficient way of developing characters. 

I intend to post more information about the Big 5 Personalities in the future, but if you are interested in this topic and would like a sneak peek at what is to come, you can find more information on my website at: https://www.rwhague.com/blog

 

RW Hague is a registered nurse and author of Surviving Midas, a YA contemporary suspense, coming soon on August 24th courtesy of City Limits Publishing.  

6 Comments

Dougp

Nice idea! I like it. But I see that I must now be a shrink in addition to being a storyteller, grammar guru, spelling wiz, verbal visualizer, poet, project manager, and of course, a self-promoting Amazon marketing specialist!!

Oct-05 at 17:36

Rawrites

I like personality tests, they interest me. But honestly? I don’t buy into this, as regards writing.

Fiction isn’t about producing “well rounded” characters. It’s about characters that have interest for a reader. They can be as one sided or as multidimensional as you like - they just need to work in the story you put them in. You discover who they are by writing the story. If it doesn’t quite work, you go back and write again.

There’s no science to it. You just have to be able to get under the skin of who you’re writing about and the best way to do this is imagination.

Oct-12 at 06:30

Elsarmonie

I think understanding personalities is important, but there are too many variations to make a character “fit” into any one set of “rules”. The character who goes outside of the set characteristics is the character that draws my attention. But understanding the psychology of character does certainly help in writing.

Oct-14 at 14:09

Marisaw

I don’t buy into it either. I don’t manufacture characters, that would feel too artificial to me. They exist already and I discover more about them by writing their story.

Oct-15 at 02:49

Onalimb

I’ve tried this. I’ve probably tried most everything. I found the descriptions too general and too broad. They categorize a family of traits, but don’t do much to define an individual. They also come at it backward and don’t tie in to the needs of the story. For example, if I’m writing a story like HP, I might see Ron as a character who hates spiders. Because he hates spiders, I can have him display the traits of neuroticism toward spiders.

That works. Trying to decide, in a vacuum, that my character is neurotic about something, without knowing what that something might be, didn’t work for me.

Oct-16 at 15:16

James_dash

I’ve studied the ‘Big 5’, Enneagram, and the Myers-Briggs Personality Indicator extensively a while back. Although they’re useful to get you thinking about personality, and how one may act and view the world similarly/differently, they’re basically nothing more than general archetypes and they do not account for the complexity, depth and apparent inconsistencies present in average human beings. They could be used as a starting point if necessary, but a character needs to be fleshed out further imho. Although I was a big proponent at first, I’d personally advise against putting people into neat little boxes–since reality is far too nuanced and messy to make any of that truly believable. My two cents.

Oct-17 at 21:13
Click here to reply
Member submitted content is © individual members.
Other material is ©2003-2021 critiquecircle.com